China’s Ministry of Commerce has announced the continuation of anti-dumping duties on imports of Acrylonitrile-butadiene rubber (NBR) from South Korea and Japan. The decision was based on an assessment that removing the duties could lead to a resurgence of dumping practices, threatening the stability of China’s domestic NBR industry.
Anti-dumping duties are trade measures imposed when imported products are sold at less than fair value, potentially harming domestic producers. These measures align with global practices, as countries like the UK and India have also implemented similar protections for industries vulnerable to unfair trade practices.
Dive into the full article below.
If you’d like to stay updated with weekly news directly in your inbox,
subscribe to Tyre News Media today!
China’s anti-dumping duties aim to create a level playing field for local NBR manufacturers. By shielding the domestic market from unfairly priced imports, these measures can protect jobs and support industry stability.
The duties are likely to increase the prices of imported NBR from South Korea and Japan, which could benefit domestic producers in the short term. However, higher costs for downstream industries relying on NBR may ripple through supply chains, potentially raising production costs for sectors like automotive and manufacturing.
History shows that such duties often lead to trade diversion rather than boosting local production. For instance, when anti-dumping measures are implemented, imports from the targeted countries typically decline, while imports from alternative sources rise.
China’s continuation of anti-dumping duties is part of a larger debate on the use of such trade measures. While they are designed to protect domestic industries, the economic arguments against anti-dumping measures include:
Anti-dumping measures like those imposed by China on NBR imports have far-reaching effects on global supply chains:
China’s decision reflects its commitment to protecting its NBR industry, aligning with broader trends in global trade protectionism. However, the long-term effects of these duties will depend on how they influence market competition, domestic innovation, and global supply chains.
While anti-dumping measures provide immediate relief to domestic industries, they carry significant risks, including higher costs and strained international trade relationships. Balancing protection with openness remains a key challenge for policymakers worldwide.
